Agent
Truth Finder works while you don't. It sweeps every connected source on a schedule, drafts the low-risk replies itself, and only escalates what genuinely needs your call to the inbox on the right.
917
checks run (last 24h)
3
responses auto-drafted
16
need a human
Agent activity log
Morning sweep
2026-05-16 06:00:00Swept 38 sources across 20 jobs. 1 critical conflicts still open; auto-drafted 2 clarification emails and 1 change order for review.
- Drawing Revision Conflict — Rev B vs. Rev C — Auto-drafted clarification — awaiting human send · Harborline Tower
Overnight deep scan
2026-05-16 02:00:00Overnight hybrid re-index + cross-reference. 4 commitments went overdue; 5 high-severity conflicts re-confirmed against the latest evidence.
- Overdue: Shop drawings will be revised to Rev C by Wednesday. — Escalated to triage · Harborline Tower
- Overdue: PM will get written weld-spec confirmation from the EOR. — Escalated to triage · Beacon Plaza
End-of-day reconcile
2026-05-15 18:00:00Reconciled evidence vs. schedule. Plan drift detected on 2 jobs; no auto-actions taken — both routed to humans.
- Plan drift — schedule stale vs. RFI scope — Routed to PM · Midtown Exchange
Needs a human (16)
Drawing Revision Conflict — Rev B vs. Rev C
The customer approved Rev C while the shop folder marks Rev B as active, and a PM status report claims 70% fabrication complete — likely from the superseded drawing.
↳ Pause work, make Rev C the single active revision, and issue a priced change order for the delta.
Cost of being wrong: $29,100–$51,100
Shop drawings will be revised to Rev C by Wednesday.
Owed by Dale Forsythe (Shop Lead) · due 2026-05-13 · not in the plan
↳ Convert to a scheduled task with an owner today.
PM will get written weld-spec confirmation from the EOR.
Owed by Project Manager · due 2026-05-12 · not in the plan
↳ Convert to a scheduled task with an owner today.
Fabricate from latest approved drawing revision
Fabrication must follow the latest customer-approved drawing revision (Rev C), not the shop's working Rev B. (confidence 92%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Governing weld specification
Structural welds must follow the engineer-of-record-confirmed weld spec, not an unconfirmed verbal note. (confidence 49%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Balcony live-load rating
Juliet balconies must meet the governing live-load rating. (confidence 51%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Fire-rated landing detail confirmation
The fire-rated landing detail described in the May 8 email must be confirmed against the approved shop drawing. (confidence 58%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Wind-load attachment criteria frozen
Rooftop screen-wall panel attachment must follow the governing wind-load criteria, confirmed by the EOR. (confidence 55%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Frames detailed to governing load schedule
Conveyor support frames must be detailed to the governing (latest vendor) load schedule. (confidence 64%)
↳ Freeze in writing with the responsible engineer before release.
Install Date Promised on Superseded Revision
The PM committed a May 27 install date based on Rev B progress. Rev C adds posts and revises the top rail, changing labor and material.
↳ Re-baseline the install date against Rev C and communicate proactively before the GC plans crews.
Cost of being wrong: $20,600–$34,100
Weld Spec — Verbal Call vs. Drawing Callout
The May 6 Teams call note cites one weld spec; the approved shop drawing callout cites another. The EOR has not confirmed either in writing.
↳ Obtain written EOR confirmation of the governing weld spec before structural welds proceed.
Cost of being wrong: $29,700–$44,100
RFI-Driven Scope Not in Schedule
Three RFIs answered by Outlook changed the anchor layout and sequence; the PM schedule is unchanged for 23 days.
↳ Reconcile RFI outcomes into the schedule and confirm the sequence with the superintendent.
Cost of being wrong: $21,600–$33,600
Balcony Live-Load Rating Mismatch
The customer requirements PDF states 60 psf; the structural sketch annotates 100 psf. Detailing should not proceed until frozen.
↳ Freeze the governing rating with Anvil's EOR before releasing detailing.
Cost of being wrong: $39,100–$54,700
Material Substitution vs. Approved Submittal
A lighter gauge was discussed on the May 9 call to hold budget, but the approved submittal still specifies the heavier gauge.
↳ Issue a formal substitution request and get written approval before cutting.
Cost of being wrong: $17,800–$30,000
Field will confirm anchor type with the superintendent.
Owed by Field Lead · due 2026-05-13 · not in the plan
↳ Convert to a scheduled task with an owner today.
PM will confirm the coating system with the architect.
Owed by Project Manager · due 2026-05-14 · not in the plan
↳ Convert to a scheduled task with an owner today.
Every auto-action is logged to the immutable audit trail.